Categories
Investigation Myths News

Unicorns in the Bible?

As a Christian, I’ve encountered my fair share of criticisms aimed at the Bible. Often, these critiques stem from misinformation circulated on the internet, leaving many unsure of what to believe. Today, I want to address one of these misconceptions: the mention of unicorns in the Bible.

Yes, you read that right. The Bible does indeed mention unicorns, not once, but nine times in the Old King James Bible. It sounds like an open-and-shut case, doesn’t it?

Well, not quite. This is actually a misconception with a simple explanation.

The King James Bible, commissioned in 1604 and released in 1611, faced the challenge of translating ancient Hebrew into English. In doing so, translators encountered the word “re’em.” Through a mix of descriptions that resembled both the rhinoceros and what some modern scholars believe to be an extinct ox species called the Aurochs (the now extinct ancestor of modern cattle), they arrived at the term “Monokeros,” meaning “one horn” in Greek. This was then translated into Latin as “unicornus,” which eventually became “unicorn” in English.

However, in later translations like the Revised Standard Bible in 1952, this term was updated to “Aurochs” or “wild ox.”

So, there you have it—a rather straightforward explanation, but an accurate one nonetheless. A similar rationale applies to the mention of dragons in the Bible, but that’s a story for another time.

In conclusion, while the mention of unicorns in the Bible may seem puzzling at first glance, understanding the historical context and translation process helps to clarify the matter. It’s a reminder that sometimes, what appears mythical may have a logical explanation behind it.

Categories
Health News

Do No Harm?

You may have heard the statistic once or twice before: Medical error is the third leading cause of death in the US.

1. Heart Disease

2. Cancer

3. Medical Error

Where does this come from? Well, this stat originated with a study named “To Err is human,” published in 2000, and the media ran with it.

A 2016 study by Johns Hopkins Medicine reaffirmed this, listing medical error as the number 3 killer. It puts the number of deaths at approximately 250,000 per year, trailing only heart disease and cancer, each with around 600,000 deaths, and surpassing respiratory disease, with around 150,000 deaths.

Out of the 70 studies analyzed covering 337,025 patients, it was found that the average preventable harm caused by doctors stands at 6%. Within that 6%, 12% of cases were severe or fatal to the patient. The largest contributors were drugs at 25% and other advanced specialties (intensive care and surgery) at 24%, compared to general hospitals.

However, these studies only looked at reported data, which suggests that these numbers are likely underreported. Given the history of the medical profession, it’s reasonable to assume that many errors go unreported due to reluctance to acknowledge mistakes.

A study published in the BMJ (British Medical Journal) pointed out that death certificates do not track medical errors and called for the CDC to overhaul the system to accommodate this. The CDC disputed this, claiming its approach aligns with international guidelines. However, the CDC doesn’t count medical errors even if listed on the death certificate, instead attributing the cause of death to whatever condition was being treated.

Dr. Martin Makary, the lead researcher, highlighted the discrepancy, stating, “You have this overappreciation and overestimate of things like cardiovascular disease, and a vast underrecognition of the place of medical care as the cause of death.” He emphasized the impact this has on national health priorities and research grants.

It’s important to note that this study has its critics. They argue that the data collected is limited to a few hospitals and may not accurately represent all hospitals nationwide. Additionally, different doctors faced with the same information may make different decisions, making it challenging to pinpoint whether a specific decision led to a patient’s death.

In essence, the need for accurate reporting, data collection, and action is crucial in addressing medical errors and preventing unnecessary deaths.

Categories
News

Funder of Sound of Freedom arrested for child kidnapping… the full story 

Funder of Sound of Freedom arrested for child kidnapping… the full story

Sound Of Freedom

Funder of Sound of Freedom arrested for child kidnapping… the full story 

 

So, you have probably heard of the movie ‘Sound of Freedom’ by now and if you haven’t, well it’s the true story of Tim Ballard (played by Jim Caviezel) who quits his government job and devotes his life to rescuing children from child sex trafficking. Despite all the considerable hurdles facing this movie, it is having an incredible run at the box office, even beating out major Hollywood blockbusters! 

 

I am yet to see this movie as it hasn’t been released here in Australia at the time of posting, but I will be seeing it as soon as I can.

 

What I’m mainly going to talk about in this article is a news story that has been picked up and run by quite a lot of media that has come out against this movie and just how disingenuous the news has been. 

This news story first came to my attention on TikTok and I was a little shocked to see it honestly. Headlines kept coming up reading “Funder of Film ‘Sound of Freedom’ Charged in Child Kidnapping Case” and many more like it. 

Obviously, this is a concerning headline.

How could a movie that is all about exposing child trafficking be involved in the very thing it is claiming to fight?

The short answer is, it isn’t. 

Honestly, the lengths that this journalist went to twist this specific story into something to slander this movie are insane! Thank you to Deadline (a news website) for bringing some key details to light. 

 

So far the facts on this story are as follows 

  1. A 50yr old man by the name of Fabian Marta invested a little over $500 in a Go Fund Me campaign. That the creators of the, yet be made, movie had started to help get the film off the ground, as part of the campaign over 6600 people would get a credit in the final film including Mr Marta.

  2. The very same Mr Marta owns a rental property.

  3. The rental property that Mr Marta owns, just recently had a tenant that is now at the center of a custody dispute. 

  4. Mr Marta was arrested as an accessory to kidnapping and is pleading not guilty. 

I am sure that you can see how with a few twists of logic and ignoring certain facts you could create a news report with the title “Major financial investor behind The Sound of Freedom involved in Kidnapping” 

 

Makes you wonder why the mainstream media has become so hell-bent on discrediting a movie trying to stop child trafficking….